Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee Wood's avatar

Thats an interesting crossover analysis :) I'd say that it's both right and wrong - in attempting to presume on known definitions. Religous people *may* correctly penetrate the superficial, and thus have a stronger grasp on Truth & Reality ; but who is qualified to stick the label 'Religous' ? Disciples of Truth under many a guise embroider a colorful parade of humanity through the millenia.

The Truth of climbing is that one must pay attention to many domains - mental wellbeing, physical training, dietary regime, social relations, plus comprehension of logisitics, mechanics and science to ensure success. Not forgetting scrupulous self honesty ! I'm sure we could have a good discussion over the 'look' of religiosity !

I'll see you at the crag one day, but will I see what you expect me to see ?!

Expand full comment
Old Curmudgeon's avatar

The studies that appear to support religiosity as a positive factor in performance may be occupying a separate field of inquiry, if only because the vast majority of all scientific studies entirely avoid religion as a factor in anything. Psychological studies may support belief as a powerful factor in human actions, but lumping any and all brands of "religion" into a claim of advantage dodges the inevitable debate about which version is most beneficial - "My God beats your god."

Less devout sports fans like myself find the particular version of piety, as shown by many a track athlete, to be tedious, displaying the antithesis of humility religion is generally supposed to foster. It feels unseemly to be thanking a Higher Power for victories in the arena where the greatest degree of genetic advantage and refined training protocols can be credited; spiritual sustenance would seem more apropos of success in the longest, most grueling endurance tests, where mental states can push the ordinary to extraordinary results. My bias leans to prayers made in the most dire and hopeless times, and these can be interpreted as self-meditations which sustain the person to carry on, as opposed to self-glorifying boasts which obscure the basic childish, self-centered desire to vanquish others in a rather transient and meaningless contest.

My experience of fifty years has found climbers to be generally less overtly religious, more cerebral, yet with more personal "spirituality" that does not manifest in Bible-thumping. A few overtly religious individuals have done well enough in competitions, and route establishment, but hardly to where that trait seems to have been significantly advantageous, with any lasting measurable superiority to peers.

The other paradox is that one can research and train, but one either believes, or doesn't. Immersion in a faith does not equate with belief, and false piety should not result in any performance boost. I may be misreading, but the whole of this essay feels a bit facetious, and perhaps intentionally bland, to disguise a sardonic undertone.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts